Home | Contact Us | Useful Links

Home

About the Picker Institute

Picker Perspectives

The Annual Picker Awards

The Picker Challenge Grants

The 2008 Research Agenda

The Picker Long-Term-Care Program

Educational Products

Our International Offices

The Picker Institute Services

The Picker Institute Surveys

The Picker Summit

The Shaller Report

Healthcare in a Land of Peoplepower

Publications/Archives

Picker Institute FAQ

Donating to the Picker Institute

About Picker Institute, Inc., and NRC

The Picker Institute
2008 Challenge Grant Request for Proposal

PURPOSE

The purpose of the Picker Institute Challenge Grant Program is to provide support, through a program of annual grants, for research and development of innovative projects designed to facilitate successful patient-centered-care initiatives and best practices in the education of our country’s future practicing physicians.

MISSION

Picker Institute, Inc., is an independent nonprofit organization dedicated to the global advancement of the principles of patient-centered care. Picker Institute sponsors research and education in the fields of patient-centered care in support of and in cooperation with educational institutions and other interested entities and persons. The institute’s mission is to foster a broader understanding of the concerns of patients and other healthcare consumers and of the theoretical and practical implications of a patient-centered approach. As a world leader in these efforts and in the measurement of the patient experience, Picker Institute is recognized as an important resource for information, advice and assistance. In keeping with this reputation and in fulfillment of its mission, the Board of Directors of Picker Institute supports the advancement of the patient-centered-care approach through a variety of programs, awards, education and related research, each of which focuses entirely on fostering the continued improvement in healthcare from the patient’s perspective.

PROPOSALS SOUGHT

The Picker Institute Challenge Grant Program is seeking proposals that illustrate how certain defined interventions, innovations and programs in graduate medical education will facilitate the successful development and implementation of best practices for patient-centered healthcare. The expected outcome of each Challenge Grant project will be the demonstration of the measurable effects and sustainability of these interventions, innovations and efforts to enhance the patient-centeredness of health care. The institute places emphasis on the long-term sustainability of improvements in patient centeredness.

Past projects have included:

  • The development and measurably effective application of patient-education tools designed to guide the physician-patient relationship for the improvement of hypertension management;
  • The effective dissemination of a program to integrate palliative care into the surgical intensive care unit.
  • The development of a graduate medical education (GME) curriculum designed to raise resident awareness of the cultural and spiritual needs of patients in the context of their medical care;

The expected resultant improvement of the successful completion of the Challenge Grant project should be consistent with one or more of Picker Institute’s 8 principles of patient-centered care as embodied in the Picker Survey:

  • Fast access to reliable health advice
  • Effective treatment delivered by staff you can trust
  • Involvement in decisions and respect for patients’ preferences
  • Clear, comprehensible information and support for self-care
  • Physical comfort and a clean, safe environment
  • Empathy and emotional support
  • Involvement of family and friends and support for careers
  • Continuity of care and smooth transitions

ELIGIBILITY

Picker Institute has developed its Challenge Grant Program in cooperation with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Designated Institutional Officials (DIOs) and Program Directors from ACGME affiliated graduate medical education (residency) programs are eligible to apply to the Challenge Grant Program.

DIOs and individual Program Directors are encouraged to demonstrate institutional involvement in or support for their proposed initiative, or to collaborate with residency programs across their institution. The degree of institutional involvement is among the criteria for consideration of a Challenge Grant award.

BUDGET

In the year 2008, Picker Institute will award Challenge Grants to four (4) deserving proposals that pursue the goal of enhancing patient-centeredness, in an amount up to $25,000 for a project period of up to one year.

The grantees and/or their institutions will be required to provide a matching contribution to the proposed project in the form of financial resources, committed and dedicated measurable time by project staff, other approved matching commitments or all of the above.

2008-2009 CHALLENGE GRANT CYCLE

March 1, 2008 - PI/ACGME Distribution of Challenge Grant Request for Proposal

March 31, 2008 - Deadline for e-mailing Letter of Intent to submit a Proposal

April 30, 2008 - Deadline for submitting the Challenge Grant Proposal via e-mail

July 1, 2008-2009 - Challenge Grant Project Cycle

Aug. 31, 2009 - Submission of Challenge Grant Project Report

REQUIRED MATERIALS FOR PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

  • The Letter of Intent is a prerequisite for submission of a full proposal, to formally communicate to the Institute the intention to submit a request for funds.
  • The LOI is to be business letter format, one page, and should outline the purpose of the project and its alignment with the eight Picker Principles of Patient-Centered Care.
  • The full proposal should be drafted in consideration of the purposes of this Grant and in consideration of the criteria for selection.
  • There is no required format for the proposal. Limit is 1,000 words.

The proposal must be accompanied by:

  • Professional biographies of the principal investigator and primary project staff, and;
  • A budget with timetable of the project.

SELECTION PROCESS

Proposals will be reviewed by the Picker Institute administrative office to ensure eligibility and completeness. Expert reviewers commissioned by the Picker Institute Board of Directors will then evaluate proposals using the following criteria:

  • The extent to which the proposed research is innovative and will advance patient-centeredness, patient-centered initiatives and best practices in graduate medical education residency programs and institutions that sponsor these programs;
  • The adequacy of the research/project design and methodology;
  • The degree to which the intervention/innovation/enhancement can be evaluated;
  • The degree of institutional involvement in the proposed initiative;
  • The likelihood that the intervention/innovation/enhancement will be replicated in or disseminated to other residency programs/sites; and
  • The qualifications of the principal investigator and primary project staff.

The Picker Institute Board of Directors and Advisors will make final selections of proposals for the Challenge Grants, utilizing the evaluative input of the expert reviewers and the following additional criteria:

  • The relevance and significance of the proposal to the purpose and goals of the Picker Institute Challenge Grant Program;
  • The adequacy of the budget, timetable and other key resources.

The actual number of Challenge Grants awarded will depend on the nature, quality and level of proposals received in the 2008 Challenge Grant Program year. Selected applicants will be invited to present their works in progress at a 2008 patient- and family-centered-care Design Conference co-sponsored by Picker Institute and the ACGME. The projects will also be highlighted in the ACGME Bulletin and at the 2009 ACGME Annual Educational Conference.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Grants will be contingent on the mutual agreement of Picker Institute and the grantee to applicable terms and conditions of grants, such as provision of proof of matching contribution; right to review and comment on potential publications; grantor acknowledgment; prior approval requirements; required fiscal and progress reports; etc.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

Electronic submission of proposals is required.

Please send all the materials related to the proposed project in one electronic document by e-mail to ACGME at mmiller@acgme.org.

All complete applications must be received by the April 30, 2008, deadline.

CONTACT

info@pickerinstitute.org


Picker Institute/ACGME Challenge Grants Project

The Challenge Grant Project is intended to establish an innovative way to engage graduate medical education programs in Picker Institute’s patient-centered healthcare mission by supporting projects that integrate successful patient-centered care initiatives and best practices into the education of future practicing physicians. The grants program focuses on helping teaching hospitals and residency programs introduce and maximize the impact of patient-centered care on residents and their training programs in the expectation that this will exert a positive influence on the entire medical education system and healthcare community.

2006 Challenge Grant Award Winners

The winners of the 2006 Picker Institute/ACGME Challenge Grants are:

TarpleyJohn M. Tarpley, M.D.
Vanderbilt Medical Center
Vanderbilt University
“Cultural Sensitivity Initiative for Medical Education”

Patient-centered care requires knowledge of and sensitivity to cultural and faith-related issues. Dr. Tarpley’s research revealed the degree to which people in the medical profession are surrounded by these issues, and the subsequent need to educate medical personnel to understand and respond to patients’ cultural and spiritual concerns.

His findings include a proposal for the development of a graduate medical education curriculum focusing on teaching healthcare professionals how to respond to patients in a culturally appropriate manner.

Cultural and spiritual sensitivity is “useful in all eight of Picker Institute’s dimensions of patient-centered care,” Dr. Tarpley concludes, and essential in these six”:

• Respect for patient’s values, preferences and expressed needs
• Information, communication and education
• Physical comfort
• Emotional support and alleviation of fear and anxiety
• Involvement of family and friends
• Transition and continuity

Click here to read Dr. Tarpley’s final report in its entirety.



William H. Hester, M.D., Principal Project Director
Richard R. Howell, M.D.
Cindy Lawrimore, F.N.P.
McLeod Family Medicine Residency Program
“Improving Patient Compliance and Outcomes in Hypertension Management in the ‘Stroke Capital’ of the World”

Hypertension is the most common primary diagnosis in the United States. Primary care physicians manage the majority of hypertensive patients. Effective communication between patient and physician is important for adequate blood pressure control.

Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled in the
McLeod study. Each patient received education regarding
hypertension through the use of four specific tools and was also instructed in the DASH diet. Medications were adjusted to attain a systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or less. Patients’ comprehension of each educational tool was measured with a brief questionnaire after each visit.

The average initial systolic blood pressure was 160 mm Hg; the average final blood pressure was 139 mm Hg. Forty percent of patients attained goal blood pressure by the second visit and 67 percent by the third visit. The average number of visits for patients who attained goal was 4.6; the average number for patients who did not attain goal was 2.8.
Ninety-six percent of patients completed at least one tool. Sixty-one percent of patients who attained goal blood pressure completed three tools compared to only 45 percent of patients who did not attain goal. Twenty-seven percent of patients who attained goal completed all four tools, compared to none of the patients who did not attain goal.

Patient education can be an important factor in treating hypertension. Simple educational tools can improve physician-patient communication. Effective communication between patient and physician improves blood pressure control.

Click here for the McLeod Family Medicine report in its entirety.


Pamela J. Boyers, Ph.D.
Riverside Methodist Hospital
“Simulation Used to Measure the ACGME Core Competencies and Patient-Centered Care”

In 2002, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced competency-based education into the institutional and program requirements for all U.S. allopathic residency programs. The six core competencies—medical knowledge, communication, professionalism, practice-based learning and improvement, systems-based care and patient care—comprise a set of standard principles by which residents can be evaluated and a general framework for curriculum development.

At present, there are no uniform guidelines to measure the successful integration of these core competencies into residency education or resident progress toward proficiency. By “simulating” doctor-patient scenarios involving such common complaints as retinal detachment, colon cancer and low back pain. Prior to and after each simulation, residents were asked to assess their own level of expertise, as was a physician who had observed the simulation.

An examination of these scores indicated that “it is possible to objectively measure the principles of patient-centered care embodied in the ACGME Core Competencies,” Dr. Boyers concluded. The multifaceted evaluation process, which includes residents’ self perceptions, recorded observations by attending-level physicians, 360-degree evaluations by standardized patients and an objective examination, has the specific advantage of measuring and recording the data generated by multiple separate observations of a given skill set. Dr. Boyers concludes that “we must continue to work to better define and measure skill sets within each competency, and to demonstrate that mastery of each competency translates into excellence in patient-centered medical care.”

Click here for Dr. Boyers’s final report in its entirety.


Anthony A. Meyer, M.D., Ph.D.
Renae E. Stafford, M.D., M.P.H.
Trauma and Critical Care Services/
The University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill


“Development and Implementation of an Interdisciplinary Palliative Care End-of-Life Education Program for Residents Who Rotate through the Surgical Intensive Care Unit”

Drs. Meyer and Stafford prepared for their study by surveying 28 surgical residents on end-of-life issues and bioethics and by administering to them a standardized palliative-care knowledge examination. Survey data and exam scores “clearly elucidated the need for further education.”

The doctors then instituted an educational program that involved the surgical residents in formal lectures, role playing, experiential learning with participation in family meetings, grand rounds presentations and journal clubs. Residents were also exposed to discussions about end-of-life and palliative care in morbidity and mortality conferences and in surgical intensive-care-unit daily rounds.

While the study has not yet been formally concluded, it has led to several initiatives that have enhanced patient-centered care at UNC, according to Drs. Meyer and Stafford. These include inclusion of surgical ICU nurses and students in the educational program; an enhanced relationship with the palliative-care service; and the institution of a “family center” near the surgical ICU to provide a place for family meetings and a quiet, restful space where families can gather, process information and grieve as loved ones face the end of their life.

2007 Challenge Grant Award Winners

             The winners of the 2007 Picker Institute/ACGME Challenge Grant are:

             Sondra Zabar, M.D., Principal Investigator, Associate Professor of Medicine
             Linda Regan M.D., Co-Investigator, Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine
             New York University School of Medicine


             "Emergency Medicine Resident Training in Interprofessional Skills:

              Evaluating a Needs-Based Curriculum"

              FINAL REPORT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (ABSTRACT)


Since the 1960’s, Emergency Medicine (EM) researchers’ efforts have worked to demonstrate the importance of patient-centered doctor-patient communication, only acknowledging decades later  Having had experience with the development and implementation of a controlled study on the impact of comprehensive, integrated clinical communication skills curriculum on student patient-centered skills, the Section of Primary Care faculty at New York University School of Medicine were prepared and eager to partner with Emergency Medicine faculty on this very important topic. With the commitment of NYUSOM-Bellevue Emergency Medicine Residency leadership, we created the Emergency Medicine Professionalism and Communication Training (EMPACT) Project.


EMPACT aimed to improve EM resident competency in communication and professionalism through the development, implementation, and evaluation of new curriculum and assessment measures. Our objectives were to: 1) design, implement and evaluate patient-centered healthcare curriculum for all 60 EM residents; 2) evaluate predictive validity of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) by assessing correlation of OSCE performance with actual resident performance in emergent care setting for cohort of PGY2 residents (n=15); and 3) disseminate this Patient-Centered Care educational program to EM programs nationally. We  addressed EMPACT in four phases:

Phase I) established baseline competency of EM interns using a 5 station OSCE;

Phase II) integrated an interactive skills-based series of five workshops focusing on interpersonal and    professionalism skills—into monthly required EM seminar series;

Phase III) conducted postcurriculum OSCE to evaluate impact of curriculum; and

Phase IV) developed and implemented two “Unannounced” Standardized Patient (USP) cases.


In completing all four phases of the EMPACT Project, we learned a lot about our residents, how to improve our OSCEs, and how to implement another USP project in the future. Residents agreed that the curriculum helped them to improve on the strengths and weaknesses identified by the OSCE. Our comparison of the residents’ pre- and post-OSCE performances has shown significant improvement in overall Communication, Relationship Development, and Patient Education Skills. Also, through our USP pilot, we learned that we will need a better understanding of the system in which we practice before embarking on such an endeavor and more USP cases to better gauge how residents perform in reality.


Even having taught communication skills in other disciplines, teaching the same skills in EM provided rich learning opportunities for us as curriculum innovators, evaluators and administrators. It is clear that learners need and appreciate curricula that are interactive and role model key patient-centered skills. Performance-based assessment, OSCE and Unannounced Patients, though time intensive, are meaningful assessment tools for both learners and programs.


Click here to read the final report in its entirety.